Promoting collaboration for sustainable and circular use of bioresources across agriculture, forestry, and aquaculture (CIRCLE)

Title: Promoting collaboration for sustainable and circular use of bioresources across agriculture, forestry, and aquaculture (CIRCLE)

Foto: Colourbox/Ruralis
Foto: Colourbox/Ruralis

Funding source: Research and education, Baltic Research Programme, European Economic Area (EEA) Grant, Project no. EEZ/BPP/VIAA/2021/9 (https://eeagrants.org/, https://eeagrants.lv/)

Implementation period: 01.10.2021.–30.04.2024.

Coordinator: Baltic Studies Centre (LV)

 

Partners: Institute of Agricultural Resources and Economics (LV), Vilnius University (LT), Estonian University of Life Sciences (EE), Institute for Rural and Regional Research (RURALIS) (NO)

Aim: The project aims to develop an interdisciplinary perspective on the circular economy in the Baltic-Nordic region by integrating insights from sociology, economics, philosophy, political science, and environmental science. The emphasis is placed on the use of by-products (bio-resources) generated as part of primary production in agriculture, forestry, and aquaculture and across the sectoral boundaries to explore the underlying models of socially- and commercially-driven collaborations, and the factors facilitating and hindering the development and wider use of circular practices and collaborative arrangements thereof.

Expected outcome: CIRCLE will generate interdisciplinary evidence-based knowledge on innovative circular business models, collaborative arrangements, and policies across and between agriculture, forestry, and aquaculture that can lead to a sustainable use of bioresources. It will provide an overview of bioresources utilised, and the factors that enable and hamper intra- and cross-sectoral circularity. Sustainability assessment criteria for circular business models will be developed to assess their socio-economic and environmental benefits. To facilitate transitions to circular bioeconomy, the project will develop pathways for sustainable and ethical circular business models and sectoral linkages and identify supportive governance and collaborative arrangements. It will generate wider societal impacts, including contribution to policies and industry, through a range of practice- and policy-oriented outputs promoting intra- and cross-sectoral circular solutions in bioresource use. CIRCLE will strengthen the research capacity of participating organisations and advance research on the circular economy in the Baltic-Nordic region.

Total funding granted: EUR 984 224

Contact person: Talis Tisenkopfs, talis.tisenkopfs@lu.lv

Project details

Project number

6636

Project period

01/10/2021 - 31/03/2024

Collaboration partners

Baltic Studies Centre (BSC) (project owner), Latvia; The Institute of Agricultural Resources and Economics (AREI), Latvia; The Estonian University of Life Sciences (EMU), Estland; and The Vilnius University (VU), Litauen

Financing

EEA Norway Grants, Baltic Research Program

Publications

  • Article

2025

A-17/25 A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of cross-sectoral bioresource residue flows from agriculture, forestry, and aquaculture: the crucial role of non-biobased sectors in the development of the circular bioeconomy

Contributors: Anda Adamsone-Fiskovica Oksana Žabko Kristiina Kerge Sandra Šūmane Svetlana Shvaichenko Armands Veveris Diana Mincyte

Description

Primary production sectors of the bioeconomy—agriculture, forestry, and aquaculture (AFA)—have a significant role in the transition towards the circular economy (CE). Their generated residues can be transformed into renewable biomass resources that serve as an input in the production processes within AFA and other sectors. Valorization of residues in new value-added products and development of new value chains often require cross-sectoral collaboration. In this paper, we use the conceptual framework of industrial symbiosis and identify patterns and test selected influencing factors of cross-sectoral flows of bioresource residues generated in AFA.

Frontiers in Sustainability, Volume 6 – 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2025.1490685
  • Article

2025

A-12/25 The curious ambivalence of working with boundary objects: Interdisciplinarity, circularity, and processual alignment of perspectives

Contributors: Emils Kilis Anda Adamsone‑Fiskovica Rando Värnik Mait Kriipsalu

Description

Forfattere: Emils Kilis, Anda Adamsone‑Fiskovica, Egil Petter Stræte, Rando Värnik, Mait Kriipsalu

Collaboration is deemed increasingly relevant in the context of environmental topics by policymakers, advocates for new modes of scientific knowledge production and funders. However, there are several issues and obstacles that hamper projects in which practitioners of different disciplines work together. In this regard, the potentially productive role of boundary objects/ concepts that allow for collaboration and coordination among groups with heterogeneous interests has been recognised. This paper approaches interdisciplinary collaboration from the perspective of an international research project that focused on circular bioresource flow across and between sectors of the bioeconomy. Based on observations during the project’s design and implementation phases, the paper explores the role of boundary objects/concepts in interdisciplinary collaboration. We conclude that boundary objects can facilitate pragmatic collaboration, but, without social interaction and engagement in the context of specific data gathering activities, this may lead to black-boxing and disciplinary segregation. Furthermore, our experience suggests that expectations surrounding interdisciplinarity must be tempered and the actual practice and social dynamics of interdisciplinarity in project-based research must be studied and discussed to uncover practical insights that can aid future projects tackling pressing environmental issues.

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, DOI:10.1007/s13412-025-01023-6

Contact us

Would you like to get in touch with us?
Fill in the form below and we will answer you as soon as possible.