LIMBO: Evaluating emerging AMR threats and future capacity for action in Norwegian livestock agriculture

The last 30 years have shown how quickly the picture of AMR in Norwegian agriculture can change.

Foto: Colourbox
3D render virus cells science and medical concept.

Antibiotic use fell 44% since 1995 but this has not been enough to prevent the establishment of AMR bacteria in livestock herds through other pathways. Clinically significant AMR bacteria were detected in swine and poultry in 2013 resulting in costly eradication measures to manage this threat. What might the next 30 years hold? Food-borne pathogens are becoming increasingly resistant to last resort antibiotics. Climate change and environmental pollution will contribute to rising AMR and unleashing new pathogens. Whereas COVID-19 looks set to redefine the political and economic landscape in Norway, and globally. AMR presents a constant challenge, a struggle between changing biological, environmental, social, and economic systems, and the development of systems to prevent AMR. How can Norway best respond to these emergent AMR problems and others not yet anticipated? How might changing societal, economic, environmental, and political contexts impact on Norwegian agriculture and its ability to respond? The aim of LIMBO is to assist Norwegian authorities and stakeholders by anticipating and preparing for future AMR challenges. The project focuses on identifying and evaluating future risk drivers and developing plausible future scenarios to enable stakeholders to assess diverse future outcomes. These scenarios will facilitate long-term planning and strategy development. We evaluate these strategies through socio-economic modelling and survey methods to identify critical success factors for adoption.

News

Grisunger i binge

What do we do with resistant bacteria in agriculture?

The use of antibiotics in Norwegian agriculture has been cut by 44 per cent since 1995, but this has not…

Read more

Publications

  • Article

2025

A 13/25-Governing antimicrobial resistance in Norwegian livestock farming to 2050: a participatory strategy development approach

Contributors: Lisa Boden Madelaine Norström Anne Margrete Urdahl

Description

Writers: Richard Helliwell, Lisa Boden, Eirik Magnus Fuglestad, Madelaine Norström, Anne Margrete Urdahl

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a wicked problem with long-term and unpredictable impacts on human and animal health. Understanding how to govern AMR long-term, amidst evolving social, political, economic, technological and environmental changes which will impact livestock production, animal health and AMR risks is therefore critical. The study used scenario planning as a methodology for envisioning plausible future challenges and thus identify possible strategic responses. The national context for this research was Norway, a stable, high-income country which has achieved low antibiotic use and low AMR prevalence in livestock farming through nearly 30 years of concerted industry and state actions. Working with Norwegian agricultural, animal and public health stakeholders, the scenario approach was motivated by the question of how to maintain existing governance capabilities and outcomes in an uncertain future. This is the first scenario planning study to explore stakeholder perceptions about important change drivers and strategies to manage uncertainties for AMR governance in the Norwegian livestock industry. Participants identified three critical drivers of change (state resource prioritisation of agriculture, trust in institutions, global geopolitical conditions) that would influence the development of Norwegian livestock farming, and public and private animal health and AMR governance capacity. The main threats were identified as erosion of trust impacting a culture of organisational collaboration on animal health, loss of capacity and solidarity in the context of declining farmers and veterinarians, and the tensions this produces between winners and losers. This was the basis for identifying several actions including the development of strong local networks of farmers, integrating veterinary and farm advisory services, utilising Ai and data technology to improve national animal health monitoring, and the need for sustaining the institutional and economic structures that are pre-conditions for work on AMR and animal health. These results highlight the importance of attending to these broader structural and institutional conditions that facilitate or hinder the adoption of biosecurity, antibiotic stewardship and preventive veterinary health measures as industry stakeholders and public authorities in Europe continue to grapple with AMR and antibiotic use in livestock farming.

Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Volume 12 – 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1616206

  • Article

2024

A-16/24 Protecting place: Norway, spatial imaginaries, and the governance of antimicrobial resistant bacteria in pig and poultry farming

Contributors:
About the Result

Norway has undertaken specific governance measures to eradicate and control MRSA and ESBL E. coli, two AMR bacterium, in pigs and poultry respectively. These measures are unique in the context of AMR governance in Europe and globally, and extend AMR governance in agriculture beyond a focus on reducing antibiotics use, towards direct efforts to control the prevalence of two AMR bacteria of concern. Based on interviews with public health, animal health, and agricultural industry organisations, this article contributes to a growing body of literature examining practices and policies of AMR governance and work on the intersection between spatial imaginaries and AMR governance. The article specifically analyses the different discursive dimensions of a dominant spatial imaginary encompassing Norway as a protective, protected and purifiable space. Within this context, AMR bacteria, as a wicked problem eluding human boundaries and barriers, is imagined as being directly actionable because the Norwegian agriculture and its spatial vulnerabilities are positioned as sufficiently stabilised that they can now be controlled. Broader agricultural and AMR governance arrangements in turn work to sustain social and material barriers to new AMR bacteria (re-)entering Norway. This sustained mode of action has arguably succeeded in reshaping Norwegian agriculture to the exclusion of these AMR bacterium from pigs and poultry. These efforts reinforce the spatial imaginary and protectionist regulatory practices that sustain Norway as a protected place.

Journal of Rural Studies, Volume 110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103361

Contact us

Would you like to get in touch with us?
Fill in the form below and we will answer you as soon as possible.