SYNAGRI: Developing synergies between the bioeconomy and regional food systems for a sustainable future

The development of a technologically advanced bioeconomy promises a more sustainable society through a shift from processing non-renewable mineral resources to renewable bioresources.

Foto: Biokraft AS
Foto: Biokraft AS

But where does this leave agriculture? Concerns have been raised that the future bioeconomy will place farmers at the bottom of value chains as suppliers of low-value biomass for processing and conversion. Adding to these concerns, advances in the last 2 years have demonstrated that biotechnologies can transform simple biomass directly, and increasingly cheaply, into food. Synthetic animal products (inc. milk products created by yeast fermentation and chicken via cellular agriculture) have been produced and sold directly to consumers in the US and Singapore. The future bioeconomy may be a serious competitor to established food systems.

This creates a challenge. On the one hand, there is significant environmental, social, and economic value to maintaining regional food systems, and on the other, key benefits to be gained from developing a technologically advanced bioeconomy. But how do we integrate the two systems such that the bioeconomy is able to drive future sustainable economic growth, preserve the positive values of existing food systems and boost the prospects of a thriving rural economy?

The aim of SYNAGRI is to understand the capacity for integration between an emerging bioeconomy and regional food systems, and develop strategies to promote an integrated, sustainable food system. The project will contribute to theoretical developments in systems thinking, understand how food systems can be transformed through integration and its implications for social, environmental, and economic sustainability. Scenario evaluation will identify desirable trajectories and policy options to achieve them.

The main outcome will be to advance a systems perspective on Norwegian food systems and assist Norway in identifying prospects for value creation through food system-bioeconomy integration.

Nyheter

Biogassanlegget på Skogn

Seminar «Kjente ressurser – uante muligheter», den norske bioøkonomien, matssystemets utvikling og retning siden 2016

I 2016 publiserte den norske regjeringen sin bioøkonomistrategi: “Kjente ressurser – uante muligheter”. Strategien etterlyser Norges ambisjon til…

Les mer

Faglig snakka: Er bioøkonomien fremtiden for den norske bonden?

Fornybare biologiske ressurser fra jordbruk, skogbruk og havbruk er utpekt som veien til en lønnsom og bærekraftig fremtid…

Les mer

Publikasjoner

  • Artikkel

2025

A-14/25 Mobilising the food system concept: Unpacking debates and applications

Bidragsytere: Damian Maye Carol Morris

Beskrivelse

Forfattere: Damian Maye, Richard Helliwell, Carol Morris

The food system concept has become the ‘go-to’ framework to galvanise discussion and bring together academics, policymakers and industry stakeholders to debate changes needed in how our food is grown, made, sold, eaten and governed. The concept is not new, but the paper shows a resurgence in application across science and social science in recent years. What is lacking, however, is more critical analysis as to why this concept is increasingly mobilised and what it offers agri-food scholarship going forward. Inspired by Jackson et al’s (2006) analysis of the food commodity chain as ‘chaotic concept’, this paper undertakes a critical review of the peer-reviewed, English language literature on food system(s) nationally in the UK and internationally. The analysis begins with a review of food system scholarship to explain concept origins and key features of systems thinking. The second part examines uptake in the wider literature. This spans 1987-2024 and reviews trends from Scopus and Web of Knowledge, followed by a structured review of social science articles for two case studies concerning respectively ‘food system transformation and crisis’ (process-based) and ‘food system and the urban’ (place-based). The analysis reveals a pattern of bi-polarisation: the first mobilises the food system as a heurist framing in contrast to the second more systemic framing. The former dominates the material reviewed. The paper argues that recognising not only different mobilisations but also the dominance of heuristic food system uses is important, given its prominence to support changes in the governance and politics of food.

The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, https://doi.org/10.48416/zq0q8s54

  • Notat

2023

N-7/23 (Dis)Connections: Exploring the conceptualisation, methodologies and promises of assemblage and systems thinking approaches in food system research

Bidragsytere:

Kontakt oss

Ønsker du å komme i kontakt med oss?
Fyll ut skjemaet under så vil vi svare deg så fort som mulig.